THE ASTROLOGY of POSITIONS, PERSPECTIVES, & METAPHYSICS
by Boots Hart, CAP
Showing posts with label Libra Moon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Libra Moon. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Agatha Christie: The Case of Mistress Mystery's Chart



Agatha Christie



Born Agatha Mary Clarissa Miller, Agatha Christie came to our world on September 15, 1890 in Torquay, England...which makes today the 120th anniversary of her birth.

In esoteric astrology, 120 is referred to as the 'years of the Sun' - or theoretically, how long a natural life we are capable of achieving. So it this a year when it would be natural for the world to note Agatha's life and lifetime achievements, maybe in some new and mysterious way?

Perhaps so.

Speaking of mysteries, the first sort of 'mystery' we need to solve in regards to Agatha's life would be the sorting out of her family, which is a bit of a puzzle from the get-go. Agatha's mother - Clarissa Margaret Boehmer - was the daughter of a British military officer. But Clarissa didn't grow up with daddy and mommy. Instead, she was sent to be raised by her mother's sister, the second wife of a wealthy American stockbroker.

In fact, Clarissa grew up to marry the American stockbroker's son from his first marriage, which meant Agatha and elder siblings Margaret and Louis Montant grew up with grandmothers who were sisters.

That being a peculiar sort of people-puzzle, do we think it gave Agatha a head start on how entwined and entangled human relationships can actually be?

Enter her chart...




 Agatha Christie - natal chart

  
Aquarius on the 6th house ruled first by a Virgo Saturn in the 1st gives a foundational skepticism. It also connects responsibility (Saturn/6th) with pragmatism (Virgo/1st house). All this will very naturally play out in Agatha's (Saturn) career, yes. But considering the 1st is also the physical body, the 6th is also health and Virgo is ruled by Mercury, this also immediately prompts us to consider Agatha's Libra Mercury.

That Libra part...Libra is the sign of the 'other' or more precisely, the relationship to the other and thus who others are to us.  Yes, we can see that also being part of Agatha's many wonderful stories. But what about the health/physical body part?

Before we get to that, it's worth looking to the house Libra actually rules - the house of choice, daily activities and personal mentality, the 3rd. Here we see Uranus. Also in Libra, this Uranus pictures Agatha as having an unusual perspective - particularly on the Libra "other." Then again, it could suggest not 'seeing' the other completely or properly because of one's Uranian haste, the 'jumping to conclusions' quality, one might say. 

Murder mysteries, anyone? Given the 'critical thinking' Uranus in 3 can also connote, maybe yes. Given the Uranian reputation for 'breakthroughs' and 'explosive change' we would have to think of Agatha as someone capable of startling insight and that sort of quirkiness of thought which would lend itself most aptly to the 'twist of plot' which marks a murder mystery.

But more personally, this would also mark Agatha as a 'free thinker.' And someone willing to 'explode' (expose?) common myths about 'others,' even those Libra relationships (the bonds with trusted people) which were not merely factors obvious in her novels, but in her life.

Ah yes...how a writer's work reflects their life. It's so natural! After all, what else do they have to write about, or from as a basis of experience?

Yet Saturn in the 1st is also discomfort, particularly in early life. And Uranus in the 3rd is also mental interruption, if not disruption. And since these placements would describe her experience of childhood not just the peculiar family setup, we have to guess that  Agatha's was not just peaches and cream. Which yes, would also set her up for an adulthood not rife with peace along with the ability to face the worst in others - and herself. Need we say that Saturn in the 1st is notorious for self-criticism along with a need for self development through extended hard work?

On the other hand, Saturn in the 1st plus Saturn being in Virgo does describe Agatha as a 'craftsman.' And with Virgo ruled by Mercury, for her to be a crafter of words and ideas seems fitting and likely. That her Sun is in a 3rd decanate (worldly) degree also tells us that whatever Agatha would 'do' in life, it ultimately would only be proved out - positive or negative - in a public arena.

All this doesn't sound so remarkable today. But remember, Agatha was born in 1890 when the average woman's 'public' effect...even exposure was far, far more limited than in today's world!

So does this make Agatha the total star? Well, let's just say she wasn't destined to get married and stay home making summer jams and minding children.

As for what she began doing in life, the first clue on that  Virgo 1st house Saturn is revealed when during WWI Agatha worked (Saturn) as a hospital nurse (Virgo/1st house physical body). And evidently she was impressed, as Agatha came away from this period lastingly referring to nursing as 'one of the most rewarding professions one can follow.'

During this time, transformative Pluto was in early Cancer. This would have it rolling into Agatha's societal 11th house and challenging and exciting her highly potent Libra Moon. The Moon always being the ruler of Cancer and always stronger merely by being in the 2nd house of personal resources and values, this is a particularly interesting Moon as its positioned at 1 Libra. An early degree of the sign of interactions...this Moon symbolizes a strong consideration of basic values - and what's more basic than life? 

More than that, Agatha's 1 Libra Moon is also strongly influenced by Scylla-Sisyphus-Vesta, all at 29 Virgo: an important notice all about 'determined service in beating the devil within.' Hello? Anyone for detectives who don't give up on finding the killer? The 'important' (to Agatha) note here being denoted by the critical 29 degree signature (29 being a position of special emphasis in any sign) to have this triad conjunct the Moon with the Moon at 1 Libra conjunct a giant 'alternative reality generator' black hole? That clues us in on a 'the devil within' and  'alternative' formats, motives and lives.

And remember - this can't just be Agatha's characters. It also has to be her life.

During this time, Neptune was also moving into Agatha's Leo 12th house, a house where Neptune tends to show its positive merciful/creative/spiritual characteristics more often. That certainly fits the nursing. 

The 12th also being the house of inspiration, and what with Leo being ruled by the Sun (and thus those 'worldly results'), it also should be no surprise that as WW1 ended and Neptune passed by Agatha's service-oriented  Hebe, the nursing dissolved (Neptune dissolves) and that instinct, that urge was transmuted. Into what, you ask? For that answer we look to where Neptune is natally, finding it intercepted in the 10th house of career, conjunct Pluto and opposition Ceres and Juno, with all in Mercury ruled Gemini, the sign (as opposed to the house) of thought, ideas and - yes - writing.

And it's the interception which lends the very interesting note here. Some experience interceptions as an inability to 'get to' the dynamic described by the sign. But for many, it's a flourishing talent - a whole 'inner world' which then gets expressed through the sign on the cusp of that house - which in this case would be the Midheaven (achievement) in late Taurus (use of talents, values and resources) with fixed stars Capulus and Algol (masculine/feminine questions of power-versus-selfish aggression). 

This all suggests why Agatha wrote - and what she wrote about, obviously. But with Taurus ruled by Venus and Agatha's Venus being positioned in that mental 3rd house conjunct Medusa (fearful knowledge) and in Scorpio...? Well! Venus in Scorpio is sticky. It's determined. It attracts power struggles and in the realm of the mental would describe powerful struggles within our minds. Did Agatha write to ease her own angst and give voice to her own issues and feelings? Probably. Did she seek to explore and reveal human nature not just in worldly form, but to the world? That's a very safe bet.

Knowing all this about her, we ask ourselves....do we know more about human nature because of (say) stories like Death on the Nile?


 Death on the Nile movie poster



Or in merely being entertained, are we doing exactly what Agatha's characters were doing - ignoring life's darker (Scorpio Venus in the mental 3rd) sides, setting ourselves up?

Casting our eyes towards Agatha's Descendant - that we offer to others and thus come to be known for (and attract others because of) - we see that marked by Hera and royal star Fomalhaut in early Pisces. Ordinarily we would think of this as 'dreams of a happy marriage' but with an Aquarian Jupiter and that Gemini Neptune we talked about as twin rulers of Pisces...might Agatha not actually dreamed of being free of what was then the traditional female role? Perhaps. And yet she might have also dreaded not adhering to society's morays some too.

Quandaries, quandaries!

And with an Ascendant (the 'what I do' in life is) marked by Thuban? Considering Thuban is 'difficult struggles for success,' no matter which way she would go there would be a lot of trials before success. Pictured here conjunct Eurydike (self sacrificing death) and royal star Regulus (success where vengeance is avoided) with that Virgo Saturn in the 1st...? We have to guess Agatha found life very testing.

And if we so guessed, we evidently would have deduced correctly. Perhaps in the vein of the eternal psychological rule that what we fear most we will surely manifest, Agatha had what is perhaps euphemistically  referred to as a 'turbulent courtship' on her way to marrying Archibald Christie on Christmas Eve of 1914.

Courtship/dating being a 5th house function, we look to her natal 5th and there find 1 Capricorn on the cusp: oh shades of Saturn! And not only that, but Icarus - the signature of headstrong risk - colors the whole of that house. So in a manner very much like her characters Agatha discarded romance as hearts and flowers and took the plunge. Which fits, as Saturn in the 1st is notorious for feeling 'not deserving,' instead relying on pragmatism. And with Agatha's Saturn conjunct Polyhymnia, muse of happiness, this is doubly likely.

So she may have gone the Saturn route, deciding  Archibald was 'okay enough.' Or that she was willing to roll the marital dice. And who are we to critique? If Agatha thought to herself 'it'll all work out' she certainly wouldn't be the first person to marry thinking things would improve once the rings were glued on, right?


 The "Murder is Easy" first edition book cover (1939)

The moment of the marriage was marked by all sorts of Jupiter, Chiron and Black Moon (calculated Lilith) signals...Agatha was 24 at the time, and we should remember that in those days, 24 was pretty much already 'spinster' territory. So we have the Jupiter 'fitting in' thing at work. Plus Chiron 'I don't know how to do this' as a challenge and wet blanket...all with a delicate frosting of social acceptance (or maybe threats of societal denial?) being put on the table by Black Moon Lilith. Whatever the situation, It couldn't have been all that comfortable, especially when we consider there also were touches of Ixion (ingratitude) and Medea (undermining love) in the mix.

And yet it all would have been so hard to be sure about, with so much of this coming from the 'is it real, or is it all a fantasy in my head?' what with Agatha's calculated Lilith being a natal resident of her Leo 12th.

That Leo 12th? Very good for writing. Not so good for reality and everyday life. Certainly not in this case! That  Agatha married with Pluto transiting natal Saturn gives us yet another sign of (Saturnine) societal obligation, but it says that all was being done under (Pluto) emotional pressure. And that Neptune was conjunct her natal Moon at the time? That suggests a lack of clarity with regards to the situation. Maybe even a sense of resignation or being overwhelmed.

From this marriage came a daughter. But just about one Jupiter (11.6 years) cycle later, everything collapsed. It was 1926 and Agatha found out hubby Archibald was having one of those 'I've found my true love' relationships with a mistress.


 Agatha Christie - Solar Return 1926


And her 1926 solar return (birthday) chart? It's highly notable in rather just this regard, showing us not one, but two interceptions. 

Such funny creatures, interceptions. And sometimes funny as a broken crutch. At once they can be the useful fantasy...the imagining how to do something in a new and wonderful way. And yet at the same time they can also be a refusal to deal with something. Or not seeing. Or not wanting to see something which has 'intercepted' your life and stopped you cold.

Here the first interception is across Agatha's solar 11th (natively Aquarian, social) and 5th (natively Leo, making-something-of-self) houses. Oh, shades of her natal Aquarian Jupiter! And Leo on her 12th, home of that calculated Lilith-Ixion-Medea! All that stuff which marked Agatha's marriage...and which to us, looking at her horoscope, would mark her vulnerabilities and secret fears!

We can't be shocked - certainly not when we get to the  second interception being across Agatha's 6th/12th house axis, the houses having to do with health, healthy responsibility and trusting, faithful connections.

With the signs intercepted being Scorpio/Taurus (Agatha's native vertical MC/IC axis) we do know this was about her sense of self and place in the world. It must have been devastating. Invalidated. Here she had already embarked on becoming a writer, and now she had been, well, written off by the one person she was supposed to be able to trust (12th house) to be responsible (6th house) with regards to respecting her essential value as a person (Taurus/Scorpio).

As if we would have any doubts about how terrible this must have been for her, the chart makes it clear:  between the two interceptions, 6 of the 10 'standard' astrological planet symbols are captured in these interceptions.

More clues as to her feelings: the solar return Moon being at Saturn-ruled 0 Capricorn is conjunct that hasty, risk-taking Icarus of the natal chart. Agatha must have felt she had taken on a bad risk. And that the return is built on a foundational IC point of 1 Leo - the exact degree of natal Chiron? It must have been terrible. Chiron is the 'I have to do what I don't have to do' and to have one's whole world imaged as being perched atop that precept?

Things must have felt precarious indeed, especially since Agatha's mother had just died too. Even if she hadn't grown up with her mother, that it was all so much, all too much is given us by transiting Eris (discord) opposing Agatha's natal Moon as all this happened just shy of the holidays.

Then along came a highly charged lunar eclipse atop the solar return's 2nd house cusp...its point of self esteem. With this in exact confrontational opposition to Agatha's under-supported, natally craving intercepted Sagittarian  Mars...?

Under this onslaught her basic need to believe (Mars) and her feelings about herself (Moon)...it all got wiped out. Had she been Lewis Carroll, we might have said she fell down the rabbit hole. Or wanted to crawl through the looking-glass. But since it's Agatha, we would just have to say she was a most unwitting victim.

And yes...from their experiences do most writers write.

So it was December 8th. This being England, we must guess it was as cold outside as it was chilling inside as Archibald and Agatha argue.

He leaves to go be with his mistress...and Agatha disappears, leaving just a note for her secretary to the effect that she's gone off to Yorkshire.

But where? Nobody knows where she is. The mystery grows. Having already been published, Agatha already has a name and her fans begin to buzz.

Days pass. A manhunt is mounted and finds nothing. The media picks up the scent and the story swirls. 

Eleven days later Agatha is finally found. Or rather, she's identified as a guest at a hotel then known as the Swan Hydropathic and now known as the Old Swan Hotel.


The Old Swan Hotel of Harrogate, 
Yorkshire, England


At said hotel, Agatha is registered as 'Mrs. Teresa Neele' of Cape Town and apparently denies all attempts to address her differently.

Doctors get called in. The vote was that Agatha is  suffering from what was then known as a 'psychogenic fugue' - a dissociate state we'd now think of as 'temporary amnesia.'

Yet some had doubts. Was this just a publicity stunt? Was Agatha trying to 'disappear' for long enough that police would think her husband had killed her?

Less than thrill-seeker commentaries on her life over the years suggest Agatha was prone to depression. And certainly her mother's death combined with her husband's infidelity would have exacerbated such a trait maximally even in one marginally prone to such things! With Saturn in the 1st we often see a sober personality - and yes, even depression even without Saturn being posited in the Mercury-ruled mental/health sign of Virgo. 

That brings us back to her Mercury...sign of mentality, perception, writing...

...Remembering that Mercury rules two signs of the zodiac (Gemini and Virgo) this 1926 return chart puts a huge emphasis on Mercury in a very convoluted way. In the return, Gemini is on the cusp of both the "I Am" physical Self 1st house and the 2nd house of self worth. In doing so, this "opens up" the natal Gemini interception - an interception which comes fully loaded and primed with Plutonic emotional transformation tightly fused with the Neptunian cavalcade of ideals versus illusions and faith versus disillusion or dissolution.

At the same time as this is in the works, Agatha's natal Ascendant and self-worth Virgoan quotients - all that has been locked away by interception in the 5th. Oh how ironic...her very sense of being intercepted in the house of pleasure. 

His pleasure, one assumes. And yet....and yet...with all those covert signals we have been given that Agatha was not the 'standard' woman of her time content to be a missus to some mister...is this really entirely about her husband's pleasure? It can't be.

On this we are left to ponder and puzzle...was this a conscious hiding of possible pleasure at how things had turned out, some unconscious desire which had come to be in spite of Agatha's conscious Self or are we simply following a line of inquiry leading nowhere?

And on the other hand, with Agatha's life being so very much one of a writer, and her native Gemini Neptune, Pluto and the North Node intercepted in the achievement oriented worldly 10th house...on one hand we have a totally regal karmic command to 'story tell,' replete with the power to do the task supremely well. And yes, we would have to think with this type of interception that there was a whole 'world' going on in Agatha's head totally apart from what anybody ever saw, heard or (yes) read of.

But something had to 'set this off.' Prior to this time Agatha was a writer. But it was only after this time that the world came to know Agatha the writer. We know about the quirky, inventive, perspective-driven Uranus in the 3rd natal house. We know that a native Mercury at 15 Libra means Agatha thought in emotional terms about others and about the emotionality of others. Coming from the 2nd house of values, resources and self worth, her Mercury would consider the motives and motivations of others. And though as a degree, 15 Libra isn't known for particular strength of resistance and resilience (hence perhaps, Agatha's breakdown?) this also speaks to her willingness to see - and write about - the weaknesses of others. Especially in relationship to others.

All this is capped off by the fact that her Libra Mercury is delineated by that natal Scorpio Venus conjunct Medusa. So often we can't see the real darkness around us until we have had it foisted upon ourselves.

This astrologers vote is for the dissociative fugue as a karmic mechanism in which we see Agatha literally turning her mentality inside out. Born at night, Agatha's chart is by Greek Sect rules Moon-ruled, which turns up the "volume" for not only the Moon, but Venus and  Mars, too. And this makes Agatha's mentally oriented 3rd, this Venus-Medusa undoubtedly part of the frightening brilliance of Agatha writing about what people are actually capable of.

If Medusa (fearful/fearing reality) wasn't in this figure we might think the Scorpio Venus was indeed all  manipulation and voted for a giant PR stunt. But people don't manipulate when they can't cope, and manipulation is a function of great collected focus. With her mother's death, her husband's betrayal Agatha's life was total emotional discord (Eris opposition Moon) with evidently no one for her to really turn to (the lunar eclipse opposing natal Mars).

The divorce became final in 1928, and by 1929 Agatha is traveling abroad to the Middle East in the company of archaeologist Max Mallowan, who she marries in 1930...


 Agatha Christie - solar return 1929/1930




In the 1929/1930 solar return we find Saturn - one of Agatha's great symbols of personal challenge - barely behind the Ascendant in expansive Sagittarius. Again an 'opening' of a natal interception, this time the sign being liberated was one natively in Agatha's 4th house of home and homeland - a perfect image of her travel abroad. And of her feeling 'free' in a whole new way.

With the square from Saturn to the Sun in the 8th, we can bet there was some to-do about how long it hadn't yet been since the split from Archibald. Agatha may even not have been quite 'over it.' Or even over him! But with an airy Aquarian Moon in the 2nd opposition a joie-de-vivre Leo Venus in the emotionally transformative 8th sitting atop her native societal Black Moon Lilith (plus universal Sappho), this is also Agatha turning her back on what others may think. It's her turn now.

And as such things work in the Land of Karma, as Agatha turned her back on accusations, in turn so did public opinion begin to turn from suspicion towards adulation for her (Leo) creative (Venusian) talents.

You know this one: you can't love me until I love me. You won't enjoy me until I enjoy being me.

So it happened. Agatha began to expand and enjoy her life, using her raft of new experiences in the Middle East as the backdrop for a whole set of novels - to include the very popular Death on the Nile and the vastly famous Murder on the Orient Express...which was published in 1934 and written (as it happens), in an Istanbul hotel near the terminus of the rail segment referred to in the book. 


Room 411 in the Hotel Pera Palace (Istanbul, Turkey) where
Agatha Christie wrote "Murder on the Orient Express" 


But then came WWII. Returning to London, Agatha reverted to early training and put her beliefs to work, taking up pharmacy work at the University College Hospital in London. And it was in that position that she learned so much about the poisons which were to play such lusciously nefarious roles in post-war novels...


 The historical buildings which are part of 
University College Hospital London


Never let it be said that life's detours don't have good uses, right? When we apply our native attributes purposefully for the good, eventually what we find we own are tools honed for purposes we might have otherwise envisioned.

The transits of this period were interestingly telling, too. Pluto was conjuncting her Chiron - turning the Chirotic 'unknown' into grist for Agatha's Gemini (thought/text) Pluto-Neptune 10th house writing powerhouse.

And this brings up a point: because so many of Agatha's natal position numbers are so close...(Chiron at 1 Leo, Ascendant at 1 Virgo, societal Jupiter at 2 Aquarius, nurturing Ceres at 2 Sagittarius, solution-oriented Juno at 4 Sagittarius)...we have to know that as Pluto conjuncts Agatha's Chiron, it's also affecting (or beginning to affect) the rest of this list. 

So as Pluto entered Leo (leaving an era of family for the realm of entertainment) Agatha began feeling differently about life. In conjuncting Chiron (the need to do what you don't know how to do) we have the signal that Agatha began feeling secure in her craft. And that she did so with Pluto simultaneously semi-sextiling her Ascendant? Well, that suggests an interesting combination of factors. With semi-sextile always being self-reflective 'traumas' (large or small depending on the transiting planet creating the aspect) Pluto semi-sextile Ascendant was indeed an inconvenient interruption of what Agatha was doing. And with rationing and bombing and all the rest, WWII London was hardly an easy or safe place to be. She was helping people who had been through physical trauma...and committing to memory much about poisons which could inflict such trauma.

You know...should someone want to, say...murder someone.

But that's not all. As during this WWII period Pluto was moving into Leo signaling such a shift in Agatha's outlook Uranus was also moving into Gemini, creating a whole dynamic of 'break throughs' in Agatha's Pluto-Neptune-North Node complex amidst the explosively Uranian blasts of Nazi bombing raids on London.

And as WWII ended, transiting Neptune opposed what we would have to assume was Agatha's resistance to her own sense of power: natal Sedna in the 8th house. She was done being her young self, her immature self, her less than potent self.The ticking of her life came to the moment of maturity and with the first resonant chime Agatha let go. And in letting go, she was able to grasp her most creative power. 

WWII was over, Agatha returned to writing full-time and her life clock struck the ringing chimes of fame. Agatha became outrageously famous: according to the Guinness Book of World Records, only Shakespeare is with Agatha Christie as the best selling (single) author of all time. In terms of books, only the Bible has outsold either one of them

And that's no idle claim. Translated into over one hundred languages, Agatha Christie novels have sold over four billion copies.

That's billion with a 'B.'

Honored countless times, Agatha Christie was awarded  royal recognition in 1956 when a solar eclipse hit her  Gemini writer's North Node, and again in 1971 when another solar eclipse opposed her sometimes limiting, eternally striving Virgo Saturn from the 7th house, the house of the audience.

And that's singularly fitting. With the 7th house always colored by its natural sign (Libra) we see the whole of Agatha's chart forming a rewarding, satisfying cycle. She gave to the audience and the audience - royal and otherwise - gave back. Agatha's Mercury was in the 2nd house of her personal self worth and she used that to write to the audience. That Mercury was ruled by a Scorpio Venus/Medusa, so she wrote murder mysteries. And in doing so, she certainly achieved financial security - the pop-astrology delineation for the 2nd house - but far more than that must have had some sense that she had weathered her own challenges.

We may be rich, we may be poor - but when we're satisfied with who we are, that's good enough. It is not money, but satisfaction which is the ultimate wage in this life.

Agatha Christie died on January 12, 1976 as three astrological notices happening together revealed the end of her tale as told in present tense...


 Agatha Christie's headstone in the churchyard of 
St. Mary's Church in Wallingford, Oxfordshire, England



...The first was Mercury Communicator going retrograde while in trine to Neptune and Pluto, a symbol of Agatha's murderously inspired writer's voice turning inward - and to the beyond. Only her words remain with us, living on in that fickle combination of imagination and imagined  deception (Mercury/Neptune) everlastingly entwined with intrigue and a wholly intriguing insight into human behavior: a mind at work (hers) working to understand minds at work.

And thus her mind lives on through words which stir our minds and get us to wondering what really is real and what is illusion. What we can trust and what is merely our confused delusion that we really know anyone...

...including our nearest and allegedly, dearest.

The second signal was Juno going retrograde conjunct her Sun, the will and life force, with all in opposition to that same Eris Discord which had timed her break from reality leading to her subsequent vast success. That this would happen in a square to the always social and societal Nodes marks her parting from us...and how the world, a world of discord would feel the loss of going on without her.

The third notice was Pluto also going retrograde, doing so in trine to its own natal position and that of Neptune, all while tightly conjunct Agatha's Mercury - a virtual reciprocation of the Mercury trine to Neptune Pluto - signaling an implosion and sealing of a life force, a stilling of pen, an unraveling of one vital mental tongue. 

Agatha's mind put itself to rest. She had transformed herself - and all of us - through probing explorations which in the end became as much about examining who humans are capable of being as using characters to cavort her tales across the pages of her many, many books.

That's what great writers do. They embody the conceptual Plutonic ability to unearth and distill human nature. They transport us into a world of entertainment where Neptunian fantasies free us, enchant us, move us and in dissolving away, allow us to feel better about living our daily lives. The Mercurial words make us do the Mercurial thing: we think. We process. And thus we become more alive in our everyday lives.

How that happens...exactly? That's the greatest mystery of all. And alas, Agatha is no longer with us to explain it...but we wish her happy birthday anyway.  


Wednesday, August 25, 2010

CHART USA (Pt. 7): Transits and a Nation in Transit


A map of the United States and Terrirorites


One of the truly useful things about astrology is in the fact that from the time/space map which any natal chart is, we can then look at transits - prescribed angles being struck by celestial objects as they continue their orbital path around the Sun.

For those who wonder why this might be a valid consideration from a scientific point of view, the answer is fairly simple, if entirely metaphysical. Working from the concept that the entirety of Existence is energy (the 'E' in E=mc2'd), then we are each born as manifestations of energy - energy bundles, if you will (shades of kiddihood) - which are 'hallmarked' by the moment and position in that All of Existence-time/space in which we were born. And much like any other 'bundle' of energy, we would be reactive to harmonics as energy frequencies (time/space) marches on.

Those harmonics are created (physically and metaphysically) by the continuing movement and reorientation of time/space as a whole - in which celestial objects are a very convenient set of markers. They do not thus 'do' anything except what all celestial objects do: they move through space, they exude magnetic waves, they disrupt the general field of space-time by moving through it.

Astrology simply reads when those waves reach Earth. And for those who say 'yes, but astrology started back in Babylon' the answer to that would be yes. And obviously back in Babylon, people weren't all that up on Relativity and magnetic resonance and the like.

But we were still human. And one of the great things about human beings is their unceasing curiosity which, when coupled to the human power of observation often leads to great discoveries. (When we're in the mood to be observant, that is.) As it happens, people evidently started observing and correlating movement of celestial objects with things here on Earth back in Babylon. People probably would feel better about astrology if such observations had begun in modern times, but that's not the way it worked. Nor does astrology's origin in antiquity make it any less correct, as discussed in a different blog post touching on some correspondence I had with that most successful and open-minded of planet hunters at CalTech, Mike Brown (link).

In any case, despite the to-be-expected debates among astrologers about transit nuances (what, you think astrologers should debate less among themselves than  politicians, lawyers, clergy and doctors do? Why should we miss out on all the fun?)....despite that, transits remain an interesting and often dispassionately reassuring source of information.

How so reassuring? Well, one of the things about being an astrologer is that you tend to hear from people when they're having a really bad time. And when you're having a really bad time, that bad time is usually marked by a transit which has a beginning and ending date. By giving those dates to a client, I provide them with a sense of when they're going to see 'the light at the end of the tunnel.'

Not that the tunnel always lets out onto their land of milk and honey, mind you - but most people would rather be able to see what they are dealing with rather than stumble along in the dark.

So where are we with Chart USA when it comes to the big and wonderful world of transits?





 
Starting with the broadest of big brush strokes, the karmic and evolutionary powers of transformation (symbolized by Pluto) moved across the IC/Nadir (foundational bottom) degree of this chart in 2002. As discussed elsewhere in this series, the IC degree of the Appomattox chart (17 Sagittarius) is one which displays a native and innocent (rather purist) belief in God - or what one believes in, even if that is a belief in nothing.

That this time corresponds to when the United States began its recent, rapid and highly polarizing/polarized  radicalization with regards to religion(s) is notable. Given this idea, we can also say that this trend will continue until Pluto moves out of the 4th house that the IC serves as cusp to. That will not happen until 2019, so enjoy the debates. 

As of 2006, Pluto also opposed Uranus, a Uranus positioned in the governmental and most worldly house of the chart - the 10th house. For astrologers/readers who time a transit uptick when a major planet comes within the standard 5-degree conjunctive orb, that moves the date back to January of 2004, suggesting that domestic and foreign difficulties ranging from the war in Iraq to governmental disorganization when greeted with the ravages of Hurricane Katrina were part of a more karmic 'shakeup' of the nation.


Uranus - source: NASA


Uranus in the 10th asks a government not to be too rigid, points to the people's need not to allow their government to be too rigid, too inaccessible, too erratic, too detached from the national mood, or too polarized/polarizing in its politics.

By 2006, a lot of these challenges had become rather obvious. And with Uranus opposition Jupiter in the natal 4th, the division and divisiveness which began in the halls of government and all it was up to would then shift to the people, as Pluto moved on from 26 Sagittarius to 28 Sagittarius, conjuncting Jupiter.


Jupiter - source: NASA


As with all things astrological, there are pluses and minuses to everything. Depending on your politics, you saw the election of Barack Obama as either a big improvement or a wholesale detriment. Whatever it was on a purely political basis however, Obama's election (and the very serious bid Hillary Clinton made in that election) did represent a clear 'broadening' of the public view on presidential politics. With this being neither a  referendum on good or bad, it is wholly Jupiterian, since Jupiter represents 'expansion' and in the house of the people denoted the 'expanding' of the popular and populace point of view.

Currently, Pluto is in the process of opposing the national 5 Cancer Mars, a symbol fraught with disruptive energy when not used in a truly universal manner - the United States' 'We the People' credo. With this transit having ratcheted into full effect in May 2010 (and running through October of 2011) its 'orb effects' where witnessed as soon as Pluto entered Capricorn.

Interestingly, given Pluto's yearly retrograde patterns, Pluto first entered Capricorn in late January 2008, just after political caucusing had begun to greatly thin down the list of candidates. As Pluto turned direct during September in the midst of a crumbling economic situation, the nation prepared to head off to the polls in early November. Duly elected if not yet sworn in, Obama's team began taking over the reins of power as Pluto committed to its transit of Capricorn in late November and the GW Bush administration appeared to have all but left the field.

Cancer is ruled by the Moon, symbol of populace and economics. With the Moon of this Chart USA also at 5 degrees, it is no wonder that the people and American government are entrenched in a debate of economics and citizens rights. From immigration to health care to national debt and so on, we can expect these heated debates to continue through October 2011, and the discussions involved therein not to be even half-way sorted out until December of 2013. 

With all of this noted however, one thing is good to know: given how the IC of any chart represents one of its biggest tests, Pluto's passage over this point tells us the United States is moving through its most internally volatile period to be seen in the roughly 150 years since the nation was re-birthed, rising like a Phoenix from the ashes of the Civil War. (Which is a very 8th house image and thus much in keeping with a national 8th house Sun!)

Yet there is no question that the US is really hard up. The Appomattox chart shows a natal Saturn in the 2nd house of talents, abilities, resources and the national coffer. This is clearly a 'what you earn you reap' symbol. Not only that, but natal Saturn sits in a grand trine with Uranus in 10 and Juno in the 6th house of employees, jobs, health, civil servants and the military.


A computer-generated image-map of Pluto - source: NASA


This means that when Pluto first started afflicting Uranus, it also began afflicting the whole Uranus-Saturn-Juno system. So we shouldn't be surprised to look back and track the roots of fiscal (Saturn) problems which entangle everything from military expenditures to health care to Wall Street, big oil and the rest of it back to that time. Saturn moved across the national Vesta (service) potently placed behind the Ascendant as the economy collapsed and rolled across that Ascendant on November 2nd, 2008 (a day before the Presidential election).

That would make the election a Saturn call for dealing with the public's economy, recalling pundits tossing around the slogan 'it's the economy, stupid!' Beyond that, it would also say that everybody would be highly disgruntled no matter who was President during the period Saturn was to transit the national 1st house. This having begun on Election Day 2008, it will continue until August 2014.

Currently, the whole of the nation is highly disgruntled and about to get even more so: with Pluto squaring the national Moon and opposition its willful (loudmouth) Mars by long-term transit, Saturn is also posed to square Mars on September 8th and conjunct the Moon on September 14th. (Those who are political junkies may also want to mark their calendars for September 27 and 28, when the Sun reaches 5 Libra, setting these transits off.)

Having moved into the national 6th house of health-work/jobs-service in May 2007, Neptune's continuing presence in this house until somewhat after 2050 suggests the United States is in a period of long term discussion and development of its own understanding of what the term 'universal' means. And what it doesn't or even can't mean to a nation. Nations have boundaries - Neptune doesn't.


 Neptune - source: NASA


This isn't an easy question, though in time the United States is likely to invest in tougher standards for citizenry and foreign aid. Why? Both reasons come down to the Mars/Ixion/Uranus sandwich in the national 10th house. For one, no nation can be in all places. Secondly, other nations don't think the way the United States does. The US is likely to get very sulky as it concludes (reluctantly) conclude that they don't get to play (Cancer) parent to the world (amidst grumbles about other nations acting like ungrateful Ixion children). Yet in the end, the nation will either pull itself back within its own boundaries or like the mythic Ixion, get roasted for sticking its nose into something totally and entirely none of its business.

It rather gets back to the boundary thing: like many parents, the US wants to protect the whole world. This is emblematic and symptomatic; parents are supposed to be models of behavior which children emulate - a nation which demonstrates war-like behaviors should not be surprised that the world and its own youth pay more attention to winning than the quality of life.

More rough waters are expected in the short run as Uranus moves through the early degrees of Aries, squaring the Cancer Mars and opposing the national  Moon.

We've already felt the entrees of these effects as Uranus hit Aries in late May 2010; considering this is Uranus in action, the center of the dispute is governmental, whether domestic or international. These transits will come into full force as of April 2012 and extend through February 2013, suggesting among other things that the next Presidential election cycle will make this last one look like afternoon tea in the Queen's most secure, demure study.

These being only the most sweeping of broad brush strokes we could go on endlessly, defining and refining transits to this chart for the United States as a modern nation forged and essentially reforged at the end of the Civil War. Just to note that the calamity most people know simply as 'Deepwater Horizon' was marked to the day by a Venus return to the Appomattox chart shows how accurate the chart is.

As this series started out, between all the intriguing explorations of the chart has remained the essential question: what is the real chart for the United States of America? Astrologers have been debating this one for at least the thirty years I've been involved in astrology and probably for more than that.

It seems pretty astonishing to this researcher that no one ever stepped back and took the time to think of the nation not in terms of where it started out (working forward), but as the nation it is today. Starting from today, working back through the tale of years, there is only one point at which the nation came apart. That's what defines a national chart - a nation which comes together and is forged from disparate parts.

During the time these blogs have been being posted, I've heard from astrologers protesting that the Union never accepted the Confederacy's breaking away. To my thinking, that simply doesn't matter. The Confederacy was enough of an entity to have its own legal tender, it's own government, its own standing army, its own constitution and other nations recognizing its existence (though granted, they dallied with whether they wanted to go public on that score.) What more can anyone ask? So what if the North didn't like it - that's why the war got fought.


 Cemetery at Shiloh National Military Park
 
Ask a hard core southerner whether the nation fractured. You'll get chapter and verse on how it did - and by some, why that was a very good idea. 

As a researcher, the feelings can't matter. What has to be accepted are the facts. In this case, the South ceded and created its own nation. The North invaded, conquered, and subdued its former territories.

The chart which came out of that was the chart erected for General Robert E. Lee's surrender to General Ulysses S. Grant in a little borrowed farm house in Appomattox, Virginia. The date was April 9, 1865 - the time (as near as we can make it) was 3:53 pm, which produces the following chart for the United States of America as the nation which exists today.


Chart USA 
April 9, 1865 - 3:53pm - Appomattox Court House, VA



.

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

CHART USA (Pt. 5): Planetary Picturing America





CHART USA


When astrologers refer to the term 'planetary pictures,' they're talking about 'pre-fab' images which appear in charts because planets fall into specific patterns.

For instance, look at Chart USA (above). See that equilateral triangle drawn in blue? That's a 'grand trine' - three interlocking 120 degree aspects which in joining, make an equilateral triangle more exact than those rather glorious pyramids of Giza. 




Pretty amazing, those pyramids. Though having been there, I'm not sure why travel agents don't feel the need to tell you how hot it is hot inside said pyramids even during Egypt's mild season.

Back on planetary pictures, the patterns astrologers refer to...the grand square, grand trine, t-square, yod, t-square, magic rectangle, etc. Whatever it is, it has a specific meaning which has specific pros and cons.

No, nothing is perfect - this is life, remember?


In Chart USA, we have several pictures, the most important of which (just an opinion) is the cardinal (proactive) sign t-square:




Most (like, maybe 90%) of t-squares connect signs of like modality...which is to say, the mode in which they operate. This one being in proactive signs indicates active energy on all sides - which yes, can be sort of leap before you look. Or think you know before you actually do know.

You know, that speaking before you have all the facts. Or in spite of them, even. The good, the bad and the outspoken, call it.

Considering this entire t-square is in early (1st decan) degrees, there's a who 'what I do' and 'who, me?' speak-or-do, then learn from the results sort of vibe too. Which when you're talking about a t-square (a construct all about accepting the full picture before you act if you hope to get anywhere)...that can be tough.

But then, the USA can be a tough little nation. See that Uranus and Cancer Mars up in the top of the chart - that 10th house? That - in part - is the US tendency to be one part hero, one part loud mouth and one part own worst enemy. But shy? Heck no - America stopped being shy when it got rid of its original be-wigged, politely intellectualized but hardly universally fair founding father's chart.


The Signing of the Constitution of the United States
by Howard Chandler Christy


With Neptune/Psyche in the USA's 7th 'what I put out there and get seen by' house, the nation is greatly blessed with altruism and highly cursed by its ability to confuse inspiration with actual ideas.

And then there's that issue of boundaries Neptune-Psyche suggests is such a problem. The 7th always being where we directly interact with 'others' (as a performer might do with their audience) this is the US' famous 'give me your tired, your sick...' along with its porous borders and a national neurosis entitled "there's a monster under my bed!" Periodically, the US just goes off on some tangent of group paranoia which apparently crops up with transiting Neptune affects the natal Jupiter-Uranus opposition.

And whether it's commies or those of Japanese descent or fundamentalist Muslims or anyone else, the sheer mass market(able) aspect of such national 'moods' is very 'the popular/populace mind' (Psyche) being under some illusion (Neptune). We know that since common sense says it's not every Muslim person who wants to blow up the World Trade Center and not every person of Japanese descent living in the US who might have been spying for the Emperor of Japan during WWII. 

But such dynamics are very much about this t-square. The 'ideal illusion' which is put out there and taken up in the national imagination (Neptune/Psyche) comes from a national altruism both about the nation as a whole and what the nation wants from other nations.

And that, of course, leads to a lot of (Neptune) confusion plus a lot of (Neptunian) disappointment.

Yet this isn't all about just Neptune on its own. Or even Neptune-Psyche being America as the 'let me help' nation - not to be confused with the 'let me butt in' nation, which Neptune/Psyche also says a lot about. Why? Because boundary problems aren't just one-way, and if astrology is good at anything, it's at laying out these polarities.

The 7th house is not only what what I put out there (the 'me' part) but also the 'how you see me' part. PLUS it's also the 'what you do/give to me' thing along with 'how I react to you.' Where we interact is where we interact whether I initiate and you react or you initiate and I react and thus how we are bound together. The audience enjoys the performer and the performer would neither have a job nor be able to succeed in their craft if there was no audience to play in. And when it works, it's magic - the actor feeds on the audience appreciation and the audience is moved and inspired by the performance. 

So it is with the US and its people: the government-populace dance. So it is with the US and other nations,  how the US responds with such charity in one moment and with bombs in a next. 

That the US is so polarized in its response to others - and even as it responds to its own is all about this t-square. Given that planetary pictures are always 'read' in zodiacal order (counter-clockwise), the last piece of this configuration - the 'pictured' goal if you will - is Moon/Quasar in egalitarian Libra, the very heart and soul of America's belief in equality and human dignity,  discussed in part two (link) of this series.

To finish up here before moving on - there is in this 7th house a Mnemosyne conjunct that US Neptune/Psyche. Mnemosyne being 'memory,' that would be the US' own history and the memory of its people. On one hand there is that American expertise in idealizing the past. You know, those good old days. That's about as Neptunian as the fact that we all know how memory tends to be incredibly selective.

And we know it when someone else is editing the mental tape, but let it be us....? Oy!

And while we're on the subject of selective Neptunian idealism, let's remember that with Neptune, when the real reality isn't your imagined reality, all sorts of rancidly disillusioned disappointment is the result. And this is not just about the US and its citizens - this is also about how other disappointed other nations can often be in America for not being what they imagine the US is. Or even that the USA doesn't always live up to its own ferociously altruistic PR!

And yet...with Neptune in the 7th opposing that brilliant (Quasar) egalitarian believe (Libra Moon) in the 1st house of national identity, the US does sound like it should be a pretty darn groovy place. Which it is - certainly comparatively. But there are a few flies in the national ointment...which is where the 't' in the t-square comes in.

Sitting in the middle of this configuration, way up high there in the 10th house we have Mars in Cancer.

Actually Mars in Cancer conjunct a couple of black holes (the "alternate reality" concept) and Ixion, ingratitude incarnate.

Mars in the 10th is all about dynamism. Mars in Cancer is all about being confined by the daily drudgery and the need to make a solid plan before you can go out and look heroic. So Mars in Cancer in the 10th is all about a government and the US commerce sector as a whole, which lives, dies, hisses, vows, spits, finagles, curses and argues by these precepts.

With this Mars squared (separate from the Neptune) by Sedna in the 7th, there's a whole test of maturity involved here. And with Sedna in the 7th, that means the rest of the world looks at the US as 'that kid nation' more than just from time-to-time. Like an irritated, anxious, hopeful family, nations of the world look to a  teenager-ish United States marveling at its lasting conviction of immortality (such as teenagers all have) and yet annoyed as all get-out at the US tendency to treat everybody else like they know nothing.

Yes, the US has youth on its side. With with youth does come that brash courage so typical of America. Like the teen who thinks nothing will ever happen to them, the US charges in to build the Panama Canal after other nations have written the effort off. It's so like the US to say 'okay, in ten years we're going to be standing on the moon' and do it. That's Mars/Ixion square Sedna and (separately) square Neptune used to the good. No, I'm not going to let you say I can't do it - it needs doing, and by gum, I'm going to figger it out and get it done!


Go big and go postal - very much a motto USA !



And without question, there's an older, wiser and somewhat more tired international family which appreciates the US vim, vigor and determination. But not so much the youthful arrogance which comes with same. Other nations love having the USA around to do the heavy lifting, but would like the US a lot better if this  young whippersnapper nation would be just a little more polite.

After all, they've survived a few thousand years and the US been around for a couple of hundred. And yet here's the US telling them how they should live? And all these Americans running all over the world criticizing people because that's now how we do it back home in America like there's nothing else worth anything?

Tsk, tsk...rather rude. And very Mars/Ixion in the 10th with all the attachments implied.

This is the heart of Chart USA's quandary: the difference between assertion and aggression. And the use of power as opposed to using the power of leadership. With two black holes hanging around this begrudged 10th house Cancer Mars, government and commerce are both driving forces for the nation and both responsible for the nation's health and well being. When either one gets aggressive instead of assertive or misuses power, the nation, its people and its reputation suffers.

And when both sectors get out of whack, that's when simple slippage turns into an avalanche, when the trickle of bad news becomes a flood.

If you're just the ordinary US citizen, this Mars/Ixion in 10 is the frustratingly annoying, often off-putting specter of watching your government and corporate sector act like Middle Ages royalty. And yet, at least all the worst of the arguing belongs to them. That there is so much bickering in Washington is highly symbolic of Mars-Uranus in the 10th. And since it's in the 10th, the rest of the nation - by implication - can go about its business more or less bicker-free.

The rule with a t-square is that when you fail the test posed by the 't', you get sent back to 'Go' without collecting $250. Also, when you fail you arrive at 'Go' on the ugly side of the dynamic.

So the US starts out wanting to do the good thing. Then everything hits the public sector - governmental or commerce - and faces the power/greed debate dynamic. All 10th house symbols always indicate a precept which must be earned...

And thus whether you're a company or a government or simply a US citizen wanting to get ahead in your career...in spite of, or maybe in addition to is a better way to put it...if you call yourself 'American' in any sense, you earn what you get.

And when you don't earn, the wages of your arrogance are - in time - public scorn. Disillusionment. Even banishment of sorts, though polite society seems to call that 'retirement' of late.

The issue with Mars in the 10th is not if you will fight, but why you fight and what you fight for. When the 'doing a service' part of earning becomes 'self-service,' it doesn't matter who or what you are, in time your very arrogance and self-absorption becomes either the means by which you are undermined or the blindness which prevents you from seeing you're doing down, baby!

And yes, then nine times out of ten there's a lot of disappointment and disillusionment to contend with - on all sides. For ultimately, this t-square which connects the 1st, 7th and 10th houses is all about a nation tied to its world, a people intrinsically tied to their nation and the fact that life itself is interconnected.

That's the message of this chart - and a fitting message it is too, coming out of the bloodiest of all US wars, the very uncivil Civil War which pitted kin against kin, country against citizen and countryman against nation.


To be American is to not be able to go it alone, that you shouldn't have to go it alone and that indeed, as a people, as a country, as a society...

United, America stands. Divided, it falls. Let all entities American take private and public note.


The Statue of Liberty, standing for liberty and justice for all -
the American ethic, ideal and ultimate necessity.